manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnology

For review articles where discrete statements are less applicable a statement should be included who had the idea for the article, who performed the literature search and data analysis, and who drafted and/or critically revised the work. and now the editor finally started to take a look? All authors contributed to the study conception and design. If the editors of Nature Sustainability decline publication of a manuscript, before or after peer review, the authors can easily transfer their manuscript to a different journal within the Nature Portfolio family by following the link provided in the editors decision email. before being sent to te reviewers an editor usually has a quick look at your paper - to see if you meet all the criteria of the journal (e.g. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. If human cells are used, authors must declare in the manuscript: what cell lines were used by describing the source of the cell line, including when and from where it was obtained, whether the cell line has recently been authenticated and by what method. All authors are requested to include information regarding sources of funding, financial or non-financial interests, study-specific approval by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving humans and/or animals, informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals (as appropriate). No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (plagiarism). In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to the journal where the manuscript is published. Other declarations include Funding, Competing interests, Ethics approval, Consent, Data and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. The editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the manuscript. All the best for your submission! Many commonly used research resources already have designated RRIDs. 333341. Identify all elements found in the figure in the figure caption; and use boxes, circles, etc., as coordinate points in graphs. If the editor decides to send the manuscript to peer reviewers, they will contact researchers with relevant expertise. Gaastra, W. (1984), in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________. If cells were bought from a life science company the following need to be given in the manuscript: name of company (that provided the cells), cell type, number of cell line, and batch of cells. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. If you include figures that have already been published elsewhere, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format. One author is assigned as Corresponding Author and acts on behalf of all co-authors and ensures that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately addressed. Authors should provide the appropriate attribution for republished images. If any magnification is used in the photographs, indicate this by using scale bars within the figures themselves. If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. Dataset identifiers including DOIs should be expressed as full URLs. The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the University of D (Ethics approval number: ). The review process at Nature Chemical Biology includes two steps: editorial assessment and external peer review. Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data. The journal also requires that authors cite any publicly available data on which the conclusions of the paper rely. I am in the same boat. This should be placed after the References section. This service is available to authors at the time of decision or at a later time. manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods But since the beginning, the status was "under consideration", until now. If address information is provided with the affiliation(s) it will also be published. The World Health Organization (WHO) definition of a clinical trial is "any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes". Figures in online appendices [Supplementary Information (SI)] should, however, be numbered separately. Decoding decisions | Nature Chemical Biology Presubmission enquiries, Our preprint policy Preprint policy and In Review, ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________, Make sure your submission is complete Preparing your material, Understand the initial formatting requirements Formatting for initial submission, Make sure your manuscript is accurate and readable Language, Do you want to participate in Double-blind Peer Review? The original indicative answer: Not a precise answer, but can be indicative also for Nature journal itself: here is a statistics of a decade 2002-2012 of publishing in Nature Materials in numbers, various stats are presented. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology | Submission guidelines - Springer Changes of authorship by adding or deleting authors, and/or changes in Corresponding Author, and/or changes in the sequence of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Sample statements for Consent to publish: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c. Number consecutively with Arabic numerals in order of mention in the text. Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. Do not use faint lines and/or lettering and check that all lines and lettering within the figures are legible at final size. Under summary of requirements (see below) funding information should be included in the Declarations section. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Informed consent for publication should be obtained if there is any doubt. Identify previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference citation at the end of the figure caption. Authors are recommended to adhere to the minimum reporting guidelines hosted by the EQUATOR Network when preparing their manuscript. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. For articles that are based primarily on the students dissertation or thesis, it is recommended that the student is usually listed as principal author: A Graduate Students Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order, APA Science Student Council 2006. If the manuscript status has been showing under consideration for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. YOU ARE NOW READY TO SUBMIT YOUR MANUSCRIPT Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include*: Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism. Haselbeck, A. and Hsel, W. (1993) Appl. Data protection, confidentiality and privacy. Also please ensure that you provide complete and accurate contact information for your suggested reviewers, including a valid institutional email address, ORCID or Scopus ID, or link to a publication record. Answered by Shalender Singh Perhaps, the subject editor assigned requires more time for assessing the manuscript. What does the status under consideration mean? Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted. The Corresponding Author is responsible for the following requirements: * The requirement of managing all communication between the journal and all co-authors during submission and proofing may be delegated to a Contact or Submitting Author. If they are unable the Journal reserves the right to withdraw a manuscript from the editorial process or in case of a published paper raise the issue with the authors institution(s) and abide by its guidelines. Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. In such cases, material from other sources should be used. In absence of specific guidelines it is recommended to adhere to the following guidelines*: All authors whose names appear on the submission. minors, patients, refugees, etc) or the use of images in sensitive contexts. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. Please note that submissions that do not include required statements will be returned as incomplete. When all authors have the same (or no) conflicts and/or funding it is sufficient to use one blanket statement. salami-slicing/publishing). a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the issues raised by the editor and peer reviewers, a response to each of the reviewers, replying to each of the points raised. This is especially true concerning images of vulnerable people (e.g. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Authors should be aware to secure informed consent from the individual (or parent or guardian if the participant is a minor or incapable) See also section on Informed Consent. Presubmission enquiries | Nature Biotechnology Figures should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order. Many researchers find that getting some independent support helps them present their results in the best possible light. 2: Nucleic Acids (Walker, J. Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate). When preparing your figures, size figures to fit in the column width. Report/Document: 4. All figures are to be numbered using Arabic numerals. The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c.. Authors should treat all communication with the Journal as confidential which includes correspondence with direct representatives from the Journal such as Editors-in-Chief and/or Handling Editors and reviewers reports unless explicit consent has been received to share information. Special Issue Information. Marine Biotechnology | Submission guidelines - Springer Reasons for changes in authorship should be explained in detail. Or did the editor make his/her final decision but simply was too lazy to write a reply? It is difficult to specify a threshold at which a financial interest becomes significant, any such figure is necessarily arbitrary, so one possible practical guideline is the following: "Any undeclared financial interest that could embarrass the author were it to become publicly known after the work was published.". Examples include creation of harmful consequences of biological agents or toxins, disruption of immunity of vaccines, unusual hazards in the use of chemicals, weaponization of research/technology (amongst others). If you are unsure whether your paper is in scope for Nature Biotechnology, you can submit a presubmission enquiry, providing an abstract of your work.You can do this in our online Manuscript . 6. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. Part of Before final acceptance, we request that corresponding authors of accepted papers link their Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) to their manuscript tracking system account ORCID instructions. If your article is accepted for publication (known as Acceptance in Principle), you will need to follow the formatting guidelines. When suggesting reviewers, the Corresponding Author must provide an institutional email address for each suggested reviewer, or, if this is not possible to include other means of verifying the identity such as a link to a personal homepage, a link to the publication record or a researcher or author ID in the submission letter. No funds, grants, or other support was received. Name your figure files with "Fig" and the figure number, e.g., Fig1.eps. Special Issue "Nature Inspired Peptides in Medical Sciences" Answered by Editage Insights This step will alert authors to possible problems with the cell line and may save considerable time and effort. For all research involving human subjects, freely-given, informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants (or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript. The XYZ Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.. 4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. My understanding is that "Editorial Decision Started" means an Editor has been assigned and is reviewing the manuscript. They should consider if the authors have complied with the journals policy on the availability of research data, and whether reasonable effort has been made to make the data that support the findings of the study available for replication or reuse by other researchers. 2. publications - What proportion of papers submitted to Nature are . M.,ed. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . For all research involving human subjects, freely-given, informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants (or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. You will need to log in; if you do not have an account, you will be able to register for one when you submit. sciencenature - HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses, Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. To ensure objectivity and transparency in research and to ensure that accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed, authors should include information regarding sources of funding, potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals. this is editorial consideration. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [NAME] repository, [PERSISTENT WEB LINK TO DATASETS]. If your manuscript issent out for peer review, you will receive an email asking you to read and sign our Editorial Policies. Springer Nature. All abbreviations should be fully defined in the text. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. These submissions are not given any priority over other manuscripts, and Editorial Board Member status has no bearing on editorial consideration. Although retrospective studies are conducted on already available data or biological material (for which formal consent may not be needed or is difficult to obtain) ethics approval may be required dependent on the law and the national ethical guidelines of a country. Reviewers are notidentified to the authors, except at the request of the reviewer. dual use of research). More templates for data availability statements, including examples of openly available and restricted access datasets, are available here: This journal strongly encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely are available to readers. Nature paper - Manuscript timeline : r/labrats - Reddit These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. Please make sure that the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current. Please note that the Journal may not use the suggestions, but suggestions are appreciated and may help facilitate the peer review process. Sample statements for "Consent to participate": Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. 19 days ago I submittedmy manuscript to a journal under Nature publishing. Once your manuscript is formally accepted, it is sent to Production to prepare for publication production process. The following resource provides insights into manuscript status tracking:Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Adding and/or deleting authors at revision stage are generally not permitted, but in some cases it may be warranted. Journal reference: 1. Please note, this decision must be made at the time of initial submission and cannot be changed later. Where an Editor or Editorial Board Member is on the author list they must declare this in the competing interests section on the submitted manuscript. quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). Include the captions in the text file of the manuscript, not in the figure file. Reviewer selection is critical to the review process, and we work hard to ensure that the different technical and conceptual aspects of the work are covered. When biological material is donated for or data is generated as part of a research project authors should ensure, as part of the informed consent procedure, that the participants are made aware what kind of (personal) data will be processed, how it will be used and for what purpose. I am anxious as I heard that usually the editor just needs 1 week to decide if a paper deservesto be sent for peer review or not. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Please describe any sources of funding that have supported the work. In this case please make sure the Corresponding Author is clearly indicated in the manuscript. These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to. [CDATA[> - 138.197.94.209. Please suggest potential reviewers for this submission. Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of biomedical and biological research and research with biological applications. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Publishing in Nature Research journals: Difference between "Editorial Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Can you put your timelines? //--> Papers will be accepted for review only if they are not under consideration by another journal. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals, Partial financial support was received from []. Type on separate pages. For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested. Authors should include a statement that confirms that an institutional or independent ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) approved the study and that informed consent was obtained from the donor or next of kin. Definition: a combination of halftone and line art, e.g., halftones containing line drawing, extensive lettering, color diagrams, etc. To obtain Biochem. The following statements must be included in your submitted manuscript under the heading 'Statements and Declarations'. Chapter in book: 2. Sample statements if identifying information about participants is available in the article: Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Biotechnology Progress - American Institute of Chemical Engineers Non-financial interests: In addition, authors are requested to disclose interests that go beyond financial interests that could impart bias on the work submitted for publication such as professional interests, personal relationships or personal beliefs (amongst others). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.. Reasons for these changes in authorship should be explained. General repositories - for all types of research data - such as figshare and Dryad may be used where appropriate. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of XYZ. Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. The Journal and Publisher assume all authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted. [CDATA[> The Publisher does not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship. . Why my paper is still in "under consideration" for such a long time? The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of A (No. [CDATA[// >